Now to Coffey and Company and NXIVM’s other 400 attorneys. If you are too stupid to see that this is a parody ridiculing the heavy handed method that Crockett is notorious for using against weak and broken defendants, you are brain dead.
Parody and Free Speech
When the United States Founding Fathers framed The Constitution, they made sure that Americans would always have the right to peacefully protest and criticize.
In America, one of the forms of criticism that's specifically protected is parody.
A parody is a work that imitates another work for the purpose of ridicule or ironic commentary. The US Supreme Court recognizes parody as a protected form of free speech, and parodies are even given special rights under copyright law.
As a result of hundreds of years of protecting parodies, the concept of parody has been firmly rooted in American culture. Parodies of celebrities and public figures are on popular television and radio shows. There are also parody magazines, parody songs, and entire parody movies. There are even parody websites and blog entrees such as this this.
Don’t like it tough. I don’t like the way you treat defenceless women.
PS; Get used to it I have a lot more coming.
See Crockett,even VANGUARD thinks its funny
13 comments:
I’m seen that kind of behavior before at a NXIVM 5 day intensive
I hear Crockett sometimes gets a visible erection when he browbeats women in court.
Hope Crockett doesn't practice intellectual property law as in copywrites.
Sorry to disapoint you chief not my video. Don't like it, click through to origninal you tube video and file a complaint with them. Now that will be $975 or my legal Consultation fee
Uploaded by sbirksted on Aug 3, 2006
IT'S A MADHOUSE!!!! LMAO - this is just so apropos...
douche
mad house
crockett's in charge
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPoEHDQZqcQ
WTH
Talking of monkey business
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8smc1_pain-monkey-business_music
BTW where is SFMPE?
The history of taking a risk to speak the truth is a long one...
Francois Rabelais constantly held the banner of truth, even at the risk at being accused of heresy which in his time involved being burned at the stake. Anything you said at any time could be used against you, not just what you said on a blog. This was 16th century France. Rabelais was a monk and a medical doctor so he had additional pressure, still he spoke.
When Rabelais wrote his blog, using the language of the people was still quite new. Latin and Greek were the language of those in power, those who made the rules. Some could sometimes insert the truth into what was said if they used the excuse of being under the uncontrollable influence of a poetic frenzy instilled by a divine bottle. This provided the excuse that was understood that the dribbles or slurps of a drunk could not be taken seriously. Rablais went there, allowed himself to be soncidered a drunk which kept him from being burned or sued multiple times by some such as the Bronfmans.
History remembers Rabelais, as they may John Tighe, because he broke with old rules, taboos, habits and hypocrisy. Rabelais was all about parody, irony, satire and gross exaggeration, like our own home grown sprout John Tighe.
Rabelais favorite targets were lawyers and any small minded twits who insists on petty conformity. Bascically the people in charge of life at that time.
Rabelais was way over the top in his writing and would make John Tighe look like a pussy cat. No disrespect to John, this is a compliment that he is on a continuum with Rabelais, who sought to teach through parody.
Rabelais believed that laughter is the proper characteristic of man. Rabelais used laughter, wine, and dirty jokes as political weapons against tyranny. Go John!
Rabelais took as a special target the idea of perfection. This idea has been around along time and a lot of people have ideas about how to attain it. Keith Raniere and Nancy Salzman believe they have found it. Rabelais would have had a good time mocking them. Now we have Saratoga in Decline.
Keith Raniere and Nancy Salzman only have abstract ideas, nothing concrete. As John has recently detailed, nothing in the real world works out for these experts on Executive Success. Lawsuits all failures. So what can anyone point to for evidence of the effectiveness of following Keith Raniere’s ideas? Nothing, nothing but one failure after another.
Yes we know Thomas Edison failed a thousand times before he invented the light bulb, but Keith Raniere is not creating anything as useful as a light bulb. Just endless patents pending for stuff we all know already.
Rabelais and his pals were determined to reform corruption. To do this Rabelais sold his books at festivals, the internet, world wide web of his time. His work sold like hotcakes. The books sold despite the ris because people who read Rabelais did not care so much about social acceptance as they did about the truth.
Those who followed Rabelaisian ideas were
outrageous, raunchy, crude and absolutely stubborn in matters of truth. Like Rabelais, John Tighe is allowing readers to re-discover principles of real ethics as we move through this process of exposing the lies of Keith Raniere. The truth is being revealed as we go along,simply because we are committed to the truth. Not because we know where it will lead.
Inquiring minds wanna know, sez:
All I want to know is why it's taken so long for just one of the judges who are involved in the multitude of NXIVM inspired lawsuits to finally put an end to the "litigation-boarding" techniques that NXIVM's lawyers routinely employ. Even Dick Cheney let the Guantánamo Bay detainees up for a breath of fresh air every once in a while!
Keep it coming John, things are heating up in the land of NXIVM, they are using everything they have, and everyone they have to scare people off.....not JT's followers, we like John stand up for the truth even if "litigation-boarding is what is coming are way!
The Bronfams seem to only hire Super Lawyers. Why is hard to understand as Clare and Sara Bronfman keep losing their endless court battles. Just more evidence of their naivete. Executive Success Programs has done nothing to improve their thought process. The brainwashed live in a buble where critical thinking is disabled.
Most people consider the Super Lawyer designation to be a pseudo honor, with nothing very real to back it up. It's appeal is to the uninformed.
Once upon a time way back in 2006, The New Jersey Supreme Court’s Committee on Attorney Advertising took the position that the ‘Super Lawyer’ and ‘Best Lawyer in America’ advertising is prohibited by the Rules of Professional Conduct. The issue was whether advertisements publicizing certain lawyers as “Super Lawyers” or “Best Lawyers in America” violate the prohibition against advertisements that are comparative in nature, or that are likely to create an unjustified expectation about results.
The Court found that advertising which promotes a designation such as “Super Lawyer” or “Best Lawyer in America” is misleading if it “compares the lawyer’s service with other lawyers’ services.” Use of superlative designations by lawyers is inherently comparative and, thus, not within the approved ambit of New Jersey’s Rules of Professional Conduct.
Such titles or descriptions,lack both court approval and objective verification of the lawyer’s ability. These self-aggrandizing titles have the potential to lead an unwary consumer to believe that the lawyers so described are, by virtue of this manufactured title, superior to their colleagues who practice in the same areas of law.
Most lawyers file these nominations with Nigerian lottery notices. Not Super Lawyers Robert Crockett, William Savino and Steve Coffey. Legal marketers advise law firms not to use these designations because they are advertising how insecure they are and demonstrating that their ego needs to be propped up with apparent praise. Said one marketer, “Most law firm marketers know to steer their firms away from this claptrap. But a new sucker is christened with a J.D. every day.”
Super Lawyers publishers fought hard to get the ruling reversed. Why? The "Super Lawyers" publication was so wildly successful (in ad sales to the magazine) that the staff popped expensive champagne and laughed about how easy it is to sell vanity to law firms. The ruling was vacated,based on the fact that publishers have a right to make a buck and lawyers have the right to be stupid.
So there you have another window on Bronfman attorneys, Robert Crockett, William Savino and Steve Coffey. They are all Super Lawyers!
With a bigger eye on their egos than on the truth.
Post a Comment