Buy me some food

Time to Election 2013

Tweeter feed

Share it

face book

share

Share |

Sunday, December 30, 2012

SPAC slammed in Readers' view in Saratogian



Well from gun shows to SPAC I have eclectic taste. A letter that I helped write is in the Saratogian today that contradicts the rather utopian view that Marcia White, President & Executive Director of SPAC would lead you to believe that all is well in the moribund and corrupt institution.The letter is below with a link HERE


Readers' View: SPAC headed in wrong direction


 The Saratoga Performing Arts Center administration’s decision to restrict the New York City Ballet’s 2013 residency to one week is deeply troubling.

Their decision to push the New York City Ballet off a “fiscal cliff” will not just affect the economic vitality of businesses in Saratoga Springs and surrounding towns and cities. It will also place the future of SPAC in jeopardy by eroding its international reputation and prestige. It is the latest in bad management decisions plaguing SPAC since the 1970s.

The New York City Ballet is the world’s most celebrated dance company, as recognized recently by the prestigious CBS News program “60 Minutes.”

In the last three years, its Saratoga residency has fallen from three weeks to five days. New York City Ballet dancers, staff and orchestra members rent and buy homes here, eat in restaurants, shop and buy groceries and frequent local businesses during their residency. Tourists who are drawn here by the quality of NYCB performances and reputation spend money locally, too. The five days allotted to the New York City Ballet next summer is not a residency. It is merely a quick stint.

The dance companies with which SPAC will replace the New York City Ballet in July 2013 could not possibly draw as many people or as much fund-raising support. While these replacements would make a fine addition to programming, they can’t replace audiences built over nearly 50 years of Saratoga’s having the honor of calling itself “The Summer Home of the New York City Ballet.”

All around us, arts venues — from Tanglewood and Jacob’s Pillow in the Berkshires, to Proctors in Schenectady, to Glimmerglass in Cooperstown — survive and even thrive because they are run by experienced arts managers who have steeped themselves in dance or music all of their lives. Given proper fundraising and arts management skills, SPAC could thrive, too. But if SPAC sticks to its current course, its slide in artistic and financial health will worsen.

There are steps that SPAC’s administration must take to ensure its financial viability. Most of these recommendations were made in the New York State Parks and Recreation audit eight years ago and never followed. They are the key to building a thriving arts organization. Among them:

• Hire a professional fundraiser — SPAC’s financial difficulties are caused by inadequate fundraising and outside support.

• Analyze compensation and performance — The president, an employee of SPAC, does not perform at the level commensurate with her compensation, which takes up nearly 4 percent of the center’s budget.

• Reaffirm its commitment to the fine arts, centered on the music and dance residencies of the Philadelphia Orchestra and New York City Ballet, which have been at the core of its mission since 1966
• Rely less on ticket sales and Live Nation and, instead, revitalize its Endowment Committee.

• Rely less on visually distracting gimmicks like mounting cellphone antennas on the amphitheater as a substitute for solid fundraising.

• Increase the size of the board of directors to include dance and music lovers regardless of their financial status.

• Join with the community — Due to past and present investment of public funds in SPAC, it is appropriate for the public to have a greater voice in the operation of the corporate affairs of SPAC.

Please join with us to let New York state know of your displeasure. Contact Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Parks and Recreation Commissioner Rose Harvey and tell them that SPAC is headed in the wrong direction. Contact New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and request a new audit of SPAC’s books. Only political pressure may convince SPAC to reverse its course in 2014.

Louise Goldstein, Saratoga Springs; John Tighe, Saratoga Springs; Rhona Koretzky, Saratoga Springs; Lisa Akker, Saratoga Springs; Mary C. Mahoney, Malta; William McColl, Schenectady; Zoe Nousiainen, Saratoga Springs; Paul Sulzmann, Troy; Ron Barnell, Schenectady (freelance photographer/classical music reviewer); Helen Bayly, Troy (member of the Royal Academy of Dance, London); Don Drewecki, Galway (Capital Region music lover/recording engineer — attended the very first concert at SPAC Aug. 4, 1966); Ron Wasserman, New York City (double-bass player in the New York City Ballet Orchestra)

Have a happy new year Marcia
Saratoga in Decline
We never Sleep
Because we’re ‘Actionable”

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Great letter. Marcia White will certainly not listen to or change because of criticism. She believes she is untouchable. She feels entitled to all her perks plus her inflated salary. She surrounds herself with "yes" men who reassure her she is, indeed, just wonderfull. Is it too late to get that other guy back?

Anonymous said...

Good letter JT and we all support you and yours efforts in this very fustrating endeavor,keep it up.....now----anymore on the growing scandal in city hall involving a "Commish" or should I say "The Commish" and a certain booze fluzzy and a city vehicle.

Lisa Potkewitz said...

Nice and well written article John. I have one more strong suggestion. Somehow allay yourselves with the New York State Council of Nonprofits (NYCON)google their web site...I believe they are a good group that helps to restructure nonprofits..they were instrumental in reorganizing Proctor's which is now thriving (and I understand recently took over adm. of Universal Preservation Hall?/)

Albert F. Callucci said...

John - Happy to see that this major issue has a chance of being addressed. How SPAC or the Board can continue to accept unacceltable performance year after year just astounds me. I am not a ballet or orchestra fan but I do realize that they are both vital to a vibrant program for SPAC and the City of Saratoga Springs. Asincere thak you to all respresented in the letter.

Anonymous said...

No one seems to speak up to defend marcia except those on her payroll. Even Ed Spychalski has many supporters. How does this woman stay in this position for which she was never qualified and in which she does a horrible job? Can we finally get rid of her before she destroys SPAC completely? Does Joe Bruno have that much power? Still???!?

Kyle York said...

This blog is a great place for facts... and corrections--
Universal Preservation Hall is still wonderfully INDEPENDENT, with no oversight/ownership/takeover by Proctor's. It remains OUR own priceless Work-in-Progress.

Anonymous said...

How much money does Marcia make a year?
Who does she answer to?

Mary Zlotnick said...

What a boondoggle! Hire me, I have over fourteen years of fund-raising, grant writing, marketing, promotions and implementing an art district. I guess I just don't know the right people.

Citizen Clancy said...

You watch your step, Missy.
I need a job worse than you do.
And I have a blog, you know?
I do, too!
And I just got a C on my History paper with my online college.
It was called "Columbus Discovered America"
So out of the way Blondie!

Anonymous said...

Kyle: You bear no resemblance to Nicholson's McMurphy except occasionally you do bear a likeness to his electrifying and shocking performance. BTW, has the Independent UPH ever been officially sanctioned for occupancy by our PSD?

The SPAC Administration is a disgrace.

Anonymous said...

You left out one of the most important steps -
Don't keep a corrupt politician's mistress in place through several changes in administration.

How is it that the NYC Ballet, the NEW YORK CITY BALLET, for cryin' out loud, how is it that this organization rates less than a hack who has greatly outstayed her (never was) welcome?

Doesn't anyone else think that maybe having such a person in charge could just be a deterrent to some fine people wanting to have their names and money associated with SPAC?